tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3891434218564545511.post4293295278953599519..comments2024-03-28T19:56:42.305-05:00Comments on Alexander Pruss's Blog: Deep Thoughts XXVIIAlexander R Prusshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05989277655934827117noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3891434218564545511.post-57184192447232659342010-08-05T15:35:32.324-05:002010-08-05T15:35:32.324-05:00I noticed the typo. I too am not immune to them. Y...I noticed the typo. I too am not immune to them. You can delete the 'last' and I'll go about living my life as if I never saw it. lol<br /><br />PS: I'm trademarking the phrase. We can't have people going around saying it as if they were the ones who came up with it. lolJarrett Cooperhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17191046219215006345noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3891434218564545511.post-44464740234994044462010-08-05T14:07:39.241-05:002010-08-05T14:07:39.241-05:00Not unless I delete the word "lasts", wh...Not unless I delete the word "lasts", which must have been a typo.Alexander R Prusshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05989277655934827117noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3891434218564545511.post-65926734828596619262010-08-05T13:42:18.758-05:002010-08-05T13:42:18.758-05:00Indeed! However, in due time that phrase will beco...Indeed! However, in due time that phrase will become catchy. :)-Jarrett Cooperhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17191046219215006345noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3891434218564545511.post-8809606464013693242010-08-05T11:21:24.138-05:002010-08-05T11:21:24.138-05:00How about: "Only the at least futureward semi...How about: "Only the at least futureward semi-eternal lasts is forever." Not so catchy?Alexander R Prusshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05989277655934827117noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3891434218564545511.post-84073367202505547692010-08-03T00:23:30.890-05:002010-08-03T00:23:30.890-05:00Should it be better read as only the eternal is co...Should it be better read as only the eternal is constantly existing? Or does adding the constantly only complicate things?<br /><br />This post reminds me of Alan Guth and his inflationary theory. He speaks of it [his theory] being eternal but notes it's really only semi-eternal, being that the 'future' is eternal on his theory, but not the past. (With each 'world or bubble/pocket' universe being finite).Jarrett Cooperhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17191046219215006345noreply@blogger.com