tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3891434218564545511.post4757123007887212550..comments2024-03-28T19:56:42.305-05:00Comments on Alexander Pruss's Blog: Mathematical proofsAlexander R Prusshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05989277655934827117noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3891434218564545511.post-56225931919334800522009-01-14T09:02:00.000-06:002009-01-14T09:02:00.000-06:00I don't think Brower would agree with you, Alex!I don't think Brower would agree with you, Alex!Martin Cookehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11425491938517935179noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3891434218564545511.post-80761362026791264342009-01-14T04:17:00.000-06:002009-01-14T04:17:00.000-06:00A nice hint. Similar to your post(s) about differe...A nice hint. Similar to your post(s) about differences btw mathematical and theoretical physics. So, logicians are the most exact herd? Well, not so fast -- philosophers of math and philosophers of logic is the right answer, I'd guess.<BR/><BR/>Here we see that exactness is context-relative. Pascal's mathematical minds (opposed to intuitive minds in Pensées, I) not exact enought for the logician.Vlastimil Vohánkahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12544439495032316597noreply@blogger.com