tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3891434218564545511.post638980550993674865..comments2024-03-28T19:56:42.305-05:00Comments on Alexander Pruss's Blog: Another argument for universal loveAlexander R Prusshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05989277655934827117noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3891434218564545511.post-72718173788186449712014-04-16T11:29:50.240-05:002014-04-16T11:29:50.240-05:00I agree with the conclusion and application, but m...I agree with the conclusion and application, but my starting point about the duty to continue loving is less clear in the case of non-persons. Alexander R Prusshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05989277655934827117noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3891434218564545511.post-73594879708972183972014-04-16T09:20:47.033-05:002014-04-16T09:20:47.033-05:00Interesting! Do you think this somehow applies to ...Interesting! Do you think this somehow applies to love of things in general? <br /><br />If so, then perhaps it can be argued that: if some thing, x, can be loved, it should be loved, but evil should never be loved, so evil is not a thing. Mikhailhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12450984267503289001noreply@blogger.com