tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3891434218564545511.post6415240035250417797..comments2024-03-28T19:56:42.305-05:00Comments on Alexander Pruss's Blog: Two kinds of occasionalismAlexander R Prusshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05989277655934827117noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3891434218564545511.post-21761977705860981462019-04-09T09:54:39.881-05:002019-04-09T09:54:39.881-05:00Doesn't 1) ultimately collapse into 2) tho...Doesn't 1) ultimately collapse into 2) though?<br /><br /><br />Because 1), when fully fleshed out, should read something like this:<br /><br /><i>God causes the water to boil because the pot is being heated (by God). God causes the pot to be heated because the burner is on (by God's power). God causes the burner to be on because….</i><br /><br /><br />Therefore, God causes the water to boil because God causes the pot to be heated. So in all links in the causal chain God is the one responsible for causal action.Wesley C.https://www.blogger.com/profile/05903323901343952714noreply@blogger.com