tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3891434218564545511.post6580653395624245351..comments2024-03-28T13:23:50.623-05:00Comments on Alexander Pruss's Blog: A reversed adverbial account of temporary intrinsicsAlexander R Prusshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05989277655934827117noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3891434218564545511.post-51643303455792695742016-02-19T12:00:02.513-06:002016-02-19T12:00:02.513-06:00Typo in post fixed, thanks! Typo in post fixed, thanks! Alexander R Prusshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05989277655934827117noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3891434218564545511.post-7614618448569465162016-02-19T11:59:04.050-06:002016-02-19T11:59:04.050-06:00I don't deny either.I don't deny either.Alexander R Prusshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05989277655934827117noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3891434218564545511.post-421767934814771812016-02-18T08:53:25.698-06:002016-02-18T08:53:25.698-06:00For this to solve your problem, it seems you would...For this to solve your problem, it seems you would have to deny one of the following:<br /><br />I am straight at t1 if I exist at t1 straightly.<br /><br />I am bent at t2 if I exist at at t2 bently.<br /><br />Do you in fact deny one of these, or do you have another solution?<br /><br />(I'm assuming the last subscript in your post is meant to be 2 rather than 1.)Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00174082073474203927noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3891434218564545511.post-57762482413334183532016-02-17T16:11:17.798-06:002016-02-17T16:11:17.798-06:00Probably the most detailed treatment of B theory i...Probably the most detailed treatment of B theory is Ted Sider's book ''Four Dimensionalism: An Ontology of Persistence and Time'' with detailed bibliography, arguments pro and con. For presentism I recommend series of articles by Thomas Crisp from Biola University.Milošhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07415201615175187675noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3891434218564545511.post-68851325323254977272016-02-17T12:06:58.862-06:002016-02-17T12:06:58.862-06:00Haha. I think you see where I am coming from. The ...Haha. I think you see where I am coming from. The B theorist says that the past, present, and the future are all equally real. It seems that on such view God could not have created the universe as a 4d block, at least that's what a Christian A theorist would say.<br /><br />Where would I find a rigorous articulation of B theory.Husain Alshehhihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14170506976242342714noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3891434218564545511.post-30570133252041876062016-02-17T11:51:22.614-06:002016-02-17T11:51:22.614-06:00There is no significant evidence that the universe...There is no significant evidence that the universe has always existed.Alexander R Prusshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05989277655934827117noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3891434218564545511.post-39517117681184723822016-02-17T11:28:59.929-06:002016-02-17T11:28:59.929-06:00But how would a Christian B theorist resolves the ...But how would a Christian B theorist resolves the problem that the universe has always been?Husain Alshehhihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14170506976242342714noreply@blogger.com