tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3891434218564545511.post6620852760390623161..comments2024-03-27T20:37:09.185-05:00Comments on Alexander Pruss's Blog: Divine temporalism once againAlexander R Prusshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05989277655934827117noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3891434218564545511.post-20428685309596546202022-07-05T13:49:42.984-05:002022-07-05T13:49:42.984-05:00Consider the assertions in this paper: arxiv.org/p...Consider the assertions in this paper: arxiv.org/pdf/2011.02348.pdf by Nicolas Gisin. In it, Gisin states that allowing real numbers to actually be a part of the physical universe would imply infinite information at the start of the universe (information being present in the real number's decimal expansion's nonterminating nature).<br /><br />Would this mean that your "no infinite causal chains principle" would also keep any typical real number (of the type that is unstructured in its decimal expansion) from having any causal role in its full value?<br />Williamhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09292602256213936359noreply@blogger.com