tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3891434218564545511.post7166075223020415477..comments2024-03-28T19:56:42.305-05:00Comments on Alexander Pruss's Blog: Is Intelligent Design a scientific theory?Alexander R Prusshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05989277655934827117noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3891434218564545511.post-4668044901703125722008-08-12T19:44:00.000-05:002008-08-12T19:44:00.000-05:00I think the detail is behind the mere claims in sc...I think the detail is behind the mere claims in scientific theory. so if one claims that 'this apple will fall from that tree' the details/theory is in how that occurs. with the claim 'an agent did that' the details/theory is in how we determine when an agent is involved - on that score I think Behe and Dembski have considerable detail (flawed or not I don't know) . but if they don't have enough detail than what would the weight of detail need to be and how would one determine when it is enough to make something a theory?Nacissehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07188729623036653803noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3891434218564545511.post-82265334808121965952008-08-12T14:04:00.000-05:002008-08-12T14:04:00.000-05:00Let me add one more note. To have a theory of a c...Let me add one more note. To have a theory of a crime, some idea of motive is typically required. But ID folks do <EM>not</EM> want to talk of the designer's motives.Alexander R Prusshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05989277655934827117noreply@blogger.com