tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3891434218564545511.post8134695454223178930..comments2024-03-27T20:37:09.185-05:00Comments on Alexander Pruss's Blog: Indicative conditionalsAlexander R Prusshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05989277655934827117noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3891434218564545511.post-3639263057129062612010-03-19T15:11:54.577-05:002010-03-19T15:11:54.577-05:00Here's a problem. George doesn't have syp...Here's a problem. George doesn't have syphilis. "If George has syphilis, he does not have paresis" is true on (1). For most people who have syphilis don't have paresis, and so the conditional probability conjunct is true. But "If George has syphilis, he does not have paresis" doesn't seem right.Alexander R Prusshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05989277655934827117noreply@blogger.com