tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3891434218564545511.post1561289320985420538..comments2024-03-28T19:56:42.305-05:00Comments on Alexander Pruss's Blog: Optimalism about necessityAlexander R Prusshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05989277655934827117noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3891434218564545511.post-73558483803967509032017-06-23T23:05:30.650-05:002017-06-23T23:05:30.650-05:00Yes to both. I'm fixing it... Good catch.Yes to both. I'm fixing it... Good catch.Alexander R Prusshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05989277655934827117noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3891434218564545511.post-24154117010532050632017-06-23T22:48:27.692-05:002017-06-23T22:48:27.692-05:00Despite having read this several times I don't...Despite having read this several times I don't understanding much after the first paragraph. Still, a couple of questions about your premises.<br /><br />1. Among the collections of <b>proportions</b>, that collection of <b>propositions</b> that would make for the best collection of the necessary truths is in fact the collection of <b>the</b> necessary truths<br /><br />Should this read "propositions" both times?<br /><br />Should I be reading "the" as "all"?<br /><br />bethyadahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08990677679970591625noreply@blogger.com