tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3891434218564545511.post3249026682216575851..comments2024-03-28T19:56:42.305-05:00Comments on Alexander Pruss's Blog: Another argument against an infinite past?Alexander R Prusshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05989277655934827117noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3891434218564545511.post-7144459498869976852013-10-17T09:29:45.944-05:002013-10-17T09:29:45.944-05:00I mean, there might be infinitely many Representat...I mean, there might be infinitely many Representative that agree with the first finite many tosses.Husain Alshehhihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14170506976242342714noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3891434218564545511.post-31546179057985477882013-10-17T09:26:53.206-05:002013-10-17T09:26:53.206-05:00I am not sure if that makes much sense, because I ...I am not sure if that makes much sense, because I don't see clearly how is it that one can guess the next toss even if the first ones matches the representative. The first few tosses have no causal relation on the next toss. Hence there is always 50% chance that it will agree with the next guess. I would like to see if there is a proof that with that method, it is the case that the guesses will eventually agree (surely) with the tosses but in finite many times. :/Husain Alshehhihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14170506976242342714noreply@blogger.com