I really enjoyed the paper. I may or may not have tried to play it off as a serious argument against the axiom of choice at a certain forum on WLC's website. It would have a better chance of being taken seriously if you would not have included "hoax" in the url. haha.
Enjoyable, but it clearly fails the ideological Turing test. Mostly it's too analytic in style, which makes your Marxist hints/winks stand out unnaturally. Not sure if this was already obvious.
I really enjoyed the paper. I may or may not have tried to play it off as a serious argument against the axiom of choice at a certain forum on WLC's website. It would have a better chance of being taken seriously if you would not have included "hoax" in the url. haha.
ReplyDeleteEnjoyable, but it clearly fails the ideological Turing test. Mostly it's too analytic in style, which makes your Marxist hints/winks stand out unnaturally. Not sure if this was already obvious.
ReplyDeleteThere are analytic philosophers who are Marxists. But they don't write in this silly way. :-)
ReplyDeleteNeeds updating to make it relevant for today. James-Pravda should be revised to James-NBC.
ReplyDelete