Is this supposed to be of the form, "McTaggart argued that P, therefore not-P"? Geez, that's hard on the guy. Or is it supposed to be of the form, "X occurred in the past, therefore time is real"? More plausible, but less perspicuous.
The latter.
I argued that unicorns are unreal. Hence they are real. :-)Don't believe me take a look:http://webecoist.momtastic.com/2010/09/21/honking-their-horn-10-amazing-real-unicorns/http://www.inquisitr.com/1029712/unicorn-vietnam-spots-real-rare-asian-species-called-saola/https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/424324272144646144/l6x-Lb0B.jpeg
Is this supposed to be of the form, "McTaggart argued that P, therefore not-P"? Geez, that's hard on the guy. Or is it supposed to be of the form, "X occurred in the past, therefore time is real"? More plausible, but less perspicuous.
ReplyDeleteThe latter.
ReplyDeleteI argued that unicorns are unreal. Hence they are real. :-)
ReplyDeleteDon't believe me take a look:
http://webecoist.momtastic.com/2010/09/21/honking-their-horn-10-amazing-real-unicorns/
http://www.inquisitr.com/1029712/unicorn-vietnam-spots-real-rare-asian-species-called-saola/
https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/424324272144646144/l6x-Lb0B.jpeg