Alexander Pruss's Blog

Monday, December 15, 2025

God and growing block

›
On the growing block theory of time, if God is in time, God grows. God doesn’t grow. So, God is not time or the growing block theory is n...

Divine timelessness

›
This is probably the simplest argument for the timelessness of God, and somehow I’ve missed out on it in the past: God does not change. C...
2 comments:
Friday, December 12, 2025

Semi-statistical views of health

›
On a purely statistical views of health, the health of a bodily system is its functioning near the average or median. This leads to the absu...
Thursday, December 11, 2025

Using general purpose LLMs to help with set theory questions

›
Are general purpose LLMs useful to figuring things out in set theory? Here is a story about two experiences I recently had. Don’t worry abou...
2 comments:
Wednesday, December 10, 2025

Plural quantification and the continuum hypothesis

›
Some people, including myself, are concerned that plural quantification may be quantification over sets in logical clothing rather than a pu...
3 comments:
Tuesday, December 9, 2025

Maybe we can create spacetime

›
Suppose a substantivalist view of spacetime on which points of spacetime really exist. Suppose I had taken a different path to my office to...
Monday, December 8, 2025

Time without anything changing

›
Consider this valid argument: Something that exists only for an instant cannot undergo real change. Something timeless cannot undergo rea...
1 comment:

The last thought

›
Entertain this thought: There is a unique last thought that anyone ever thinks and it’s not true. Or, more briefly: The last thought i...
2 comments:
Friday, December 5, 2025

An improved paradox about thoughts and worlds

›
Yesterday , I offered a paradox about possible thoughts and pluralities of worlds. The paradox depends on a kind of recombination principle ...
2 comments:
Thursday, December 4, 2025

Thoughts and pluralities of worlds: A paradox

›
These premises are plausible if the quantifiers over possible thoughts are restricted to possible non-divine thoughts and the quantifiers ov...
1 comment:

Classical mereology and causal regresses

›
Assume classical mereology with arbitrary fusions. Further assume two plausible theses: If each of the y s is caused by at least one of t...
4 comments:
Wednesday, December 3, 2025

Persons and temporal parts

›
On perdurantism, we are four-dimensional beings made of temporal parts, and our actions are fundamentally those of the temporal parts. This...
2 comments:

Imposing the duty of gratitude

›
Normally if Alice did something supererogatory for Bob, Bob has gained a duty to be grateful to me. It is puzzling that we have this normati...
4 comments:
Tuesday, December 2, 2025

Disbelief

›
Suppose Alice believes p . Does it follow that Alice disbelieves not- p ? Or would she have to believe not-not- p to disbelieve not- p ? (...
4 comments:

Omniscience and vagueness

›
Suppose there is metaphysical vagueness, say that it’s metaphysically vague whether Bob is bald. God cannot believe that Bob is bald, since ...
›
Home
View web version

About Me

Alexander R Pruss
I am a philosopher at Baylor University. This blog, however, does not purport to express in any way the opinions of Baylor University. Amateur science and technology work should not be taken to be approved by Baylor University. Use all information at your own risk.
View my complete profile
Powered by Blogger.