Alexander Pruss's Blog

Thursday, September 27, 2012

Indexing

›
Indexing is mind-numbing. I've got over 700 proposed headings for the index of my One Body book. I need to search for key words for e...
6 comments:
Tuesday, September 25, 2012

Sacrificing the fine-tuning argument to the argument from evil

›
The argument from evil is no stronger an argument than the fine-tuning argument. Moreover, the two are nicely paired up. Just as...
39 comments:
Monday, September 24, 2012

Good reasons, naturalism and evolution

›
Start with these three facts: I have good ( prima facie ) reason to promote my own survival. I believe (1). I know (1). Now, ...
5 comments:
Friday, September 21, 2012

Defending what you don't really believe?

›
Here's a fascinating study. By changing what was in front of the subjects on the questionnaire they were filling out, the subjects wer...
4 comments:

Priors don't wash out

›
When I was a grad student, I was taught that in Bayesian epistemology the prior probabilities wash out as evidence comes in. But ...
11 comments:
Thursday, September 20, 2012

A potential solution to the Benacerraf problem

›
The Benacerraf problem is that there seem to be too many answers to the question of what the numbers are—too many constructions wi...
Wednesday, September 19, 2012

More amusement with infinitesimal probabilities

›
Suppose we uniformly pick a random number from the interval [0,1] ([ a , b ] is the closed interval from a to b , both inclusive). On s...
4 comments:
Tuesday, September 18, 2012

Sceptical scenarios and theism

›
There are many large-scale sceptical scenarios: brains in vats, evil demons, anti-inductive worlds, evolutionary scenarios that lead as...
44 comments:
Monday, September 17, 2012

Vagueness and the foundations of mathematics

›
There are many set-theoretic constructions of the natural numbers. For instance, one might let 0 be the empty set ∅, 1 be {0}, 2 be {1,2...
5 comments:
Saturday, September 15, 2012

Deflation of the foundations of probability

›
I don't really want to commit to the following, but it has some attraction. Question 1: What is probability? Answer: Any as...
6 comments:
Friday, September 14, 2012

A new sceptical argument

›
Let's say that an infinite sequence of real-numbered observations is generated by independent runs of a random process. Suppose t...

Not only am I myself, but I am my self

›
(Premise) I am experiencing writing this post. (Premise) My self is experiencing writing this post. (Premise) Only one entity...
Thursday, September 13, 2012

An argument from evil against naturalism

›
Consider this valid argument: (Premise) Moral outrage at an event is misplaced when no one is responsible for the event. (Premise) Mora...
27 comments:
Tuesday, September 11, 2012

Values, persons and wholes

›
Start with these premises: Value personalism: Nothing is more valuable than a good person except perhaps for another good person. ...

Defending infinitary frequentism from some arguments

›
Frequentism defines probabilities in terms of long-term frequencies of outcomes. This doesn't work very well with finite frequencie...
6 comments:
‹
›
Home
View web version

About Me

Alexander R Pruss
I am a philosopher at Baylor University. This blog, however, does not purport to express in any way the opinions of Baylor University. Amateur science and technology work should not be taken to be approved by Baylor University. Use all information at your own risk.
View my complete profile
Powered by Blogger.