Is this supposed to be of the form, "McTaggart argued that P, therefore not-P"? Geez, that's hard on the guy. Or is it supposed to be of the form, "X occurred in the past, therefore time is real"? More plausible, but less perspicuous.
The latter.
I argued that unicorns are unreal. Hence they are real. :-)Don't believe me take a look:http://webecoist.momtastic.com/2010/09/21/honking-their-horn-10-amazing-real-unicorns/http://www.inquisitr.com/1029712/unicorn-vietnam-spots-real-rare-asian-species-called-saola/https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/424324272144646144/l6x-Lb0B.jpeg
Post a Comment
3 comments:
Is this supposed to be of the form, "McTaggart argued that P, therefore not-P"? Geez, that's hard on the guy. Or is it supposed to be of the form, "X occurred in the past, therefore time is real"? More plausible, but less perspicuous.
The latter.
I argued that unicorns are unreal. Hence they are real. :-)
Don't believe me take a look:
http://webecoist.momtastic.com/2010/09/21/honking-their-horn-10-amazing-real-unicorns/
http://www.inquisitr.com/1029712/unicorn-vietnam-spots-real-rare-asian-species-called-saola/
https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/424324272144646144/l6x-Lb0B.jpeg
Post a Comment