Suppose Alice believes p. Does it follow that Alice disbelieves not-p? Or would she have to believe not-not-p to disbelieve not-p? (Granted, in both classical and intuitionistic logic, not-not-p follows from p.)
Maybe this is a merely verbal question about “disbelieves”.
Or could it be that disbelief is a primitive mental state on par with belief?
No comments:
Post a Comment