Here is an unfortunate fact:
- The last minute of your life can consist of constant conscious pain.
Of course, I think all pain is conscious, but I might as well spell it out. The modality of the “can” in this post will be something fairly ordinary, like some sort of nomic possibility.
Now say that a reference frame is “ordinary for you” provided that it is a reference frame corresponding to something moving no more than 100 miles per hour relative to your center of mass.
Next, note that switching between reference frames should not turn pain into non-pain: consciousness is not reference-frame relative. Thus:
- If the last minute of your life consists of constant conscious pain, then in every reference frame that is ordinary for you, in the last half-minute of your life you are in constant conscious pain.
Relativistic time-dilation effects of differences between “ordinary” frames will very slightly affect how long your final pre-death segment of pain is, but will not shorten that segment by even one second, and certainly not by 30 seconds.
Next add:
- If materialism is true, then you cannot have a conscious state when you are the size of a handful of atoms.
Such a small piece of the human body is not enough for consciousness.
But now (1)–(3) yield an argument against materialism. I have shown here that, given the simplifying assumption of special relativity, in almost every reference frame, and in particular in some ordinary frames, your life will end with you being the size of a handful of atoms. If materialism is true, in those frames towards the very end of your life you will have to exist without consciousness by (3), and in particular you won’t be able to have constant conscious pain (or any other conscious state) for your last half-minute.
5 comments:
Should't 3 be 'If materialism is false?'
Thanks! Corrected.
Can there be any pain in a conscious state when you are the size of a handful of atoms? If pain has a material component, then it is not clear that even a immaterial conscious state can be conscious of the !pain' in a body the size of a handful of atoms.
So, I wonder if 1 is true.
Good question. Maybe we can say, however, that an immaterial conscious state can be transtemporal, connected to a physical state that (in that reference frame) is past.
Suppose it is connected to a physical state that in that reference frame is past, then why isn't it also trasnstemporally connected to the state that , in that reference frame is present (or even future, for that matter)?
Post a Comment